On hallowing our diminishments

On hallowing our diminishments

Thirty years ago, John Jungblut wrote a short pamphlet entitled, On Hallowing Our Diminishments. It’s a treatise suggesting ways we might frame the humiliations and diminishments that beset us through circumstance, age and accidents so that, despite the humiliation they bring, we can place them under a certain canopy so as to take away their shame and restore to us some lost dignity.

And we all suffer diminishments. Certain things are dealt to us by genetics, history, circumstance, the society we live in or by the ravages of aging or accidents that, seen from almost every angle, are not only bitterly unfair but can also seemingly strip us of our dignity and leave us humiliated.

Bodilydefect

For example, how does one deal with a bodily defect that society deems unsightly? How does one deal with being discriminated against? How does one deal with an accident that leaves one partially or wholly paralysed? How does one deal with the debilitations that come with old age? How does one deal with a loved one who was violated or killed simply because of the color of his or her skin? How does one deal with the suicide of a loved one? How do we set these things under some canopy of dignity and meaning so that what is an awful unfairness is not a permanent source of indignity and shame? How does someone hallow his or her diminishments?

Soren Kierkegaard offers this advice. He, who was sometimes publicly ridiculed during his lifetime, including newspaper cartoons that made sport of his physical appearance (his ‘spindly legs’), offers this counsel: in the face of something like this, he says, it’s not a question of denying it, covering it up or trying various distractions and tonics to deaden it or keep its sharpness at bay. Rather we must make ourselves genuinely aware of it, “by bringing it to complete clarity”.

By doing this, we hallow it. We bring it out of the realm of shame and give it a certain dignity. How is this done?

Imagine this as a paradigmatic example: a young woman is walking alone along a deserted road and is forcibly picked up by a group of drunken men who rape and kill her and leave her body in a ditch. Her shocked and horrified family and community do as Kierkegaard counsels.  They don’t try to deny what happened, cover it up or try various distractions and tonics to deaden their pain. Instead, they bring it to ‘complete clarity’.  How?

They pick up her body, wash it, clothe her in her best clothing and then have a three-day wake that culminates in a huge funeral attended by hundreds of persons. And their ritual honouring of her doesn’t stop there. After the funeral they gather in a park near where she lived and after some hours of testimony that honours who she was, they rename the park after her.

What they do, of course, does not bring her back to life, does not erase in any way the horrible unfairness of her death, does not bring her killers to justice and it does not fundamentally change the societal conditions that helped cause her violent death. But it does, in an important way, restore to her some of the dignity that was so horribly ripped away from her.

Both she and her death are hallowed. Her name and her life now will forever speak of something beyond the unfairness and tragedy of her death.

We see examples of this on the macro level in way the world has handled the deaths of people like Martin Luther King , John F. Kennedy, Bobby Kennedy , Malcolm X, Jamal Khashoggi and others who were killed by hatred.

The indignity of death is eclipsed by proper clarity around the very diminishment that brought about death?”

We have found ways to hallow them so that their lives and their persons are now remembered in ways that eclipse the manner of their deaths.

And we see this too in how some communities handle the deaths of loved ones who have been senselessly shot by gang members or by police, where their manner of death belies everything that’s good.

The same is true for how some families handle the diminishments of their loved ones who die by drug overdose, suicide or dementia.

The indignity of their death is eclipsed by proper clarity around the very diminishment that brought about their death.  Their memory is redeemed.

In short, that’s the function of any proper wake and any proper funeral. In bringing to clarity the very indignity that befalls someone we restore her dignity.

This is true not only for those who die unfairly or in ways that leave those they left behind grasping for ways to give them back some dignity.

It’s also true for every kind of humiliation and indignity we, ourselves, suffer in life, from the wounds of our childhood which can forever haunt us, to the many humiliations we suffer in adulthood.

We cannot change what has happened to us, but we can hallow it by ‘bringing it to clarity’ so that the indignity is eclipsed.